Makefile changes, and make Topology::getBestSupernode() return the "next" supernode if I am a supernode. Also some comment cleanup.
This commit is contained in:
parent
95d123cfc2
commit
282114e96c
4 changed files with 108 additions and 91 deletions
|
@ -161,65 +161,92 @@ void Topology::saveIdentity(const Identity &id)
|
|||
SharedPtr<Peer> Topology::getBestSupernode(const Address *avoid,unsigned int avoidCount,bool strictAvoid) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
SharedPtr<Peer> bestSupernode;
|
||||
unsigned int l,bestSupernodeLatency = 65536;
|
||||
uint64_t now = Utils::now();
|
||||
uint64_t lds,ldr;
|
||||
|
||||
Mutex::Lock _l(_supernodes_m);
|
||||
|
||||
// First look for a best supernode by comparing latencies, but exclude
|
||||
// supernodes that have not responded to direct messages in order to
|
||||
// try to exclude any that are dead or unreachable.
|
||||
for(std::vector< SharedPtr<Peer> >::const_iterator sn(_supernodePeers.begin());sn!=_supernodePeers.end();) {
|
||||
// Skip explicitly avoided relays
|
||||
for(unsigned int i=0;i<avoidCount;++i) {
|
||||
if (avoid[i] == (*sn)->address())
|
||||
goto keep_searching_for_supernodes;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (_amSupernode) {
|
||||
/* If I am a supernode, the "best" supernode is the one whose address
|
||||
* is numerically greater than mine (with wrap at top of list). This
|
||||
* causes packets searching for a route to pretty much literally
|
||||
* circumnavigate the globe rather than bouncing between just two. */
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip possibly comatose or unreachable relays
|
||||
lds = (*sn)->lastDirectSend();
|
||||
ldr = (*sn)->lastDirectReceive();
|
||||
if ((lds)&&(lds > ldr)&&((lds - ldr) > ZT_PEER_RELAY_CONVERSATION_LATENCY_THRESHOLD))
|
||||
goto keep_searching_for_supernodes;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((*sn)->hasActiveDirectPath(now)) {
|
||||
l = (*sn)->latency();
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
if ((l)&&(l < bestSupernodeLatency)) {
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
if (_supernodeAddresses.size() > 1) { // gotta be one other than me for this to work
|
||||
std::set<Address>::const_iterator sna(_supernodeAddresses.find(_r->identity.address()));
|
||||
if (sna != _supernodeAddresses.end()) { // sanity check -- _amSupernode should've been false in this case
|
||||
for(;;) {
|
||||
if (++sna == _supernodeAddresses.end())
|
||||
sna = _supernodeAddresses.begin(); // wrap around at end
|
||||
if (*sna != _r->identity.address()) { // pick one other than us -- starting from me+1 in sorted set order
|
||||
SharedPtr<Peer> p(getPeer(*sna));
|
||||
if ((p)&&(p->hasActiveDirectPath(now))) {
|
||||
bestSupernode = p;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* If I am not a supernode, the best supernode is the active one with
|
||||
* the lowest latency. */
|
||||
|
||||
keep_searching_for_supernodes:
|
||||
++sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsigned int l,bestSupernodeLatency = 65536;
|
||||
uint64_t lds,ldr;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
bestSupernode->use(now);
|
||||
return bestSupernode;
|
||||
} else if (strictAvoid)
|
||||
return SharedPtr<Peer>();
|
||||
// First look for a best supernode by comparing latencies, but exclude
|
||||
// supernodes that have not responded to direct messages in order to
|
||||
// try to exclude any that are dead or unreachable.
|
||||
for(std::vector< SharedPtr<Peer> >::const_iterator sn(_supernodePeers.begin());sn!=_supernodePeers.end();) {
|
||||
// Skip explicitly avoided relays
|
||||
for(unsigned int i=0;i<avoidCount;++i) {
|
||||
if (avoid[i] == (*sn)->address())
|
||||
goto keep_searching_for_supernodes;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have nothing from above, just pick one without avoidance criteria.
|
||||
for(std::vector< SharedPtr<Peer> >::const_iterator sn=_supernodePeers.begin();sn!=_supernodePeers.end();++sn) {
|
||||
if ((*sn)->hasActiveDirectPath(now)) {
|
||||
unsigned int l = (*sn)->latency();
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
if ((l)&&(l < bestSupernodeLatency)) {
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
// Skip possibly comatose or unreachable relays
|
||||
lds = (*sn)->lastDirectSend();
|
||||
ldr = (*sn)->lastDirectReceive();
|
||||
if ((lds)&&(lds > ldr)&&((lds - ldr) > ZT_PEER_RELAY_CONVERSATION_LATENCY_THRESHOLD))
|
||||
goto keep_searching_for_supernodes;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((*sn)->hasActiveDirectPath(now)) {
|
||||
l = (*sn)->latency();
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
if ((l)&&(l < bestSupernodeLatency)) {
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
keep_searching_for_supernodes:
|
||||
++sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
bestSupernode->use(now);
|
||||
return bestSupernode;
|
||||
} else if (strictAvoid)
|
||||
return SharedPtr<Peer>();
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have nothing from above, just pick one without avoidance criteria.
|
||||
for(std::vector< SharedPtr<Peer> >::const_iterator sn=_supernodePeers.begin();sn!=_supernodePeers.end();++sn) {
|
||||
if ((*sn)->hasActiveDirectPath(now)) {
|
||||
unsigned int l = (*sn)->latency();
|
||||
if (bestSupernode) {
|
||||
if ((l)&&(l < bestSupernodeLatency)) {
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
bestSupernodeLatency = l;
|
||||
bestSupernode = *sn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue