Revise peer path weighting to always prioritize cluster-optimal paths.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cecfa99b7b
commit
4c455876f9
6 changed files with 107 additions and 50 deletions
|
@ -31,13 +31,21 @@
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Flag indicating that this path is suboptimal
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is used in cluster mode to indicate that the peer has been directed
|
||||
* to a better path. This path can continue to be used but shouldn't be kept
|
||||
* or advertised to other cluster members. Not used if clustering is not
|
||||
* built and enabled.
|
||||
* Clusters set this flag on remote paths if GeoIP or other routing decisions
|
||||
* indicate that a peer should be handed off to another cluster member.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL 0x0001
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Flag indicating that this path is optimal
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Peers set this flag on paths that are pushed by a cluster and indicated as
|
||||
* optimal. A second flag is needed since we want to prioritize cluster optimal
|
||||
* paths and de-prioritize sub-optimal paths and for new paths we don't know
|
||||
* which one they are. So we want a trinary state: optimal, suboptimal, unknown.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL 0x0002
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Maximum return value of preferenceRank()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -176,17 +184,39 @@ public:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
inline InetAddress::IpScope ipScope() const throw() { return _ipScope; }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @param f Valuve of ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL and inverse of ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL (both are changed)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline void setClusterSuboptimal(bool f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (f) {
|
||||
_flags = (_flags | ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL) & ~ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
_flags = (_flags | ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL) & ~ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return True if ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL is set
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline bool isClusterSuboptimal() const { return ((_flags & ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL) != 0); }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return True if ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL is set
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline bool isClusterOptimal() const { return ((_flags & ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL) != 0); }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return Preference rank, higher == better (will be less than 255)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline unsigned int preferenceRank() const throw()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// First, since the scope enum values in InetAddress.hpp are in order of
|
||||
// use preference rank, we take that. Then we multiple by two, yielding
|
||||
// a sequence like 0, 2, 4, 6, etc. Then if it's IPv6 we add one. This
|
||||
// makes IPv6 addresses of a given scope outrank IPv4 addresses of the
|
||||
// same scope -- e.g. 1 outranks 0. This makes us prefer IPv6, but not
|
||||
// if the address scope/class is of a fundamentally lower rank.
|
||||
/* First, since the scope enum values in InetAddress.hpp are in order of
|
||||
* use preference rank, we take that. Then we multiple by two, yielding
|
||||
* a sequence like 0, 2, 4, 6, etc. Then if it's IPv6 we add one. This
|
||||
* makes IPv6 addresses of a given scope outrank IPv4 addresses of the
|
||||
* same scope -- e.g. 1 outranks 0. This makes us prefer IPv6, but not
|
||||
* if the address scope/class is of a fundamentally lower rank. */
|
||||
return ( ((unsigned int)_ipScope << 1) | (unsigned int)(_addr.ss_family == AF_INET6) );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -199,8 +229,13 @@ public:
|
|||
* received something) scaled/corrected by the preference rank within the
|
||||
* ping keepalive window. That way higher ranking paths are preferred but
|
||||
* not to the point of overriding timeouts and choosing potentially dead
|
||||
* paths. */
|
||||
return (_lastReceived + (preferenceRank() * (ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY / ZT_PATH_MAX_PREFERENCE_RANK)));
|
||||
* paths. Finally we increase the score for known to be cluster optimal
|
||||
* paths and decrease it for paths known to be suboptimal. */
|
||||
uint64_t score = _lastReceived + ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY; // make sure it's never less than ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY to prevent integer underflow
|
||||
score += preferenceRank() * (ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY / ZT_PATH_MAX_PREFERENCE_RANK);
|
||||
score += (uint64_t)(_flags & ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_OPTIMAL) * (ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY / 2); // /2 because CLUSTER_OPTIMAL is flag 0x0002
|
||||
score -= (uint64_t)(_flags & ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL) * ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY;
|
||||
return score;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -259,18 +294,6 @@ public:
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef ZT_ENABLE_CLUSTER
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @param f New value of ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline void setClusterSuboptimal(bool f) { _flags = ((f) ? (_flags | ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL) : (_flags & (~ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL))); }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return True if ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL is set
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline bool isClusterSuboptimal() const { return ((_flags & ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL) != 0); }
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return Current path probation count (for dead path detect)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue