mirror of
git://git.code.sf.net/p/cdesktopenv/code
synced 2025-03-09 15:50:02 +00:00
POSIX compliance fix: apply 'set -u' to $1, $2, ...
POSIX requires[*] that expanding any unset parameter other than $@ and $* is an error when 'set -u'/'set -o nounset' is active. However, on ksh93, $1, $2, ... were exempt as well. That is a bug. [*] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_25 src/cmd/ksh93/sh/macro.c: - varsub(): Backport code for handling 'set -u' for positional parameters from the ast 2016-10-01-beta branch. src/cmd/ksh93/tests/options.sh: - Add relevant regression tests. src/cmd/ksh93/sh.1: - Document that $@ and $* are exempt from 'set -u'. (cherry picked from commit f954c6be0748c4c38a680a75f27564965fbd328e)
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2a648b41f
commit
36da314c9e
5 changed files with 22 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1195,6 +1195,14 @@ retry1:
|
|||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
v = 0;
|
||||
/* Handle 'set -u'/'set -o nounset' for positional parameters */
|
||||
if(!v && sh_isoption(SH_NOUNSET))
|
||||
{
|
||||
d=fcget();
|
||||
fcseek(-1);
|
||||
if(!(d && strchr(":+-?=",d)))
|
||||
errormsg(SH_DICT,ERROR_exit(1),e_notset,ltos(c));
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case S_ALP:
|
||||
if(c=='.' && type==0)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue