mirror of
https://github.com/Ysurac/openmptcprouter.git
synced 2025-03-09 15:40:20 +00:00
Fix for RUTX platform
This commit is contained in:
parent
ccdb64ad45
commit
59bc57d5d5
7254 changed files with 1810270 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|||
Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour
|
||||
From: "Anders Larsen" <alarsen@rea.de>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:21 +0200
|
||||
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
>I still see references to _armboot_start, _armboot_end_data, and
|
||||
>_armboot_end - which role do these play now? Can we get rid of them?
|
||||
>
|
||||
>How are they (should they be) set in your memory map above?
|
||||
|
||||
_armboot_start contains the value of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE (0xA07E0000); it seems
|
||||
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE and _armboot_start are both used for the same purpose in
|
||||
different parts of the (ARM) code.
|
||||
Furthermore, the startup code (cpu/<arm>/start.S) internally uses
|
||||
another variable (_TEXT_BASE) with the same content as _armboot_start.
|
||||
I agree that this mess should be cleaned up.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue