78f1ebfcb1
* Improve README with AI and add new features 1. Update README file with AI to make it more informative and user-friendly 2. Add a detailed table of contents (TOC) with an introduction for easy navigation 3. Introduce an auto-detecting Automake feature that displays the correct installation command 4. Add support for SRT to HTTP-TS config file 5. Refine the WHIP delete location URL 6. Add support for disabling encryption for WHIP or WHEP This pull request aims to enhance the quality of the project by introducing innovative features and making the necessary updates. These updates will help users navigate the project more efficiently while also improving the overall project's quality. --------- Co-authored-by: ChenGH <chengh_math@126.com> Co-authored-by: john <hondaxiao@tencent.com>
8.8 KiB
Performance
Here are the listed performance benchmark data with corresponding commits for your reference.
- Performance Guide for x86/x64 Tests.
- Performance Guide for RaspberryPi.
- If you are interested in multiple processes performance, please refer to #775: REUSEPORT or OriginCluster(CN/EN).
- For RTC benchmarking, you may use srs-bench.
Play RTMP benchmark
The following data reflects the performance of RTMP playback, as tested using the srs-bench tool:
| Update | SRS | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-12-07 | 2.0.67 | 10k(10000) | players | 95% | 656MB | code |
| 2014-12-05 | 2.0.57 | 9.0k(9000) | players | 90% | 468MB | code |
| 2014-12-05 | 2.0.55 | 8.0k(8000) | players | 89% | 360MB | code |
| 2014-11-22 | 2.0.30 | 7.5k(7500) | players | 87% | 320MB | code |
| 2014-11-13 | 2.0.15 | 6.0k(6000) | players | 82% | 203MB | code |
| 2014-11-12 | 2.0.14 | 3.5k(3500) | players | 95% | 78MB | code |
| 2014-11-12 | 2.0.14 | 2.7k(2700) | players | 69% | 59MB | - |
| 2014-11-11 | 2.0.12 | 2.7k(2700) | players | 85% | 66MB | - |
| 2014-11-11 | 1.0.5 | 2.7k(2700) | players | 85% | 66MB | - |
| 2014-07-12 | 0.9.156 | 2.7k(2700) | players | 89% | 61MB | code |
| 2014-07-12 | 0.9.156 | 1.8k(1800) | players | 68% | 38MB | - |
| 2013-11-28 | 0.5.0 | 1.8k(1800) | players | 90% | 41M | - |
| Update | SFU | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Threads | VM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-11 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 4000 | players | ~94% x1 | 419MB | 1 | G5 8CPU |
| 2021-05-11 | NginxRTMP/v1.2.1 | 2400 | players | ~92% x1 | 173MB | 1 | G5 8CPU |
Note: The test was conducted on CentOS7 with a video bitrate of 600Kbps and CPU of G5-2.5GHZ (SkyLake).
Publish RTMP benchmark
The following data reflects RTMP publishing performance, as tested using the srs-bench tool:
| Update | SRS | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-12-04 | 2.0.52 | 4.0k(4000) | publishers | 80% | 331MB | [code][p5] |
| 2014-12-04 | 2.0.51 | 2.5k(2500) | publishers | 91% | 259MB | [code][p4] |
| 2014-12-04 | 2.0.49 | 2.5k(2500) | publishers | 95% | 404MB | [code][p3] |
| 2014-12-04 | 2.0.49 | 1.4k(1400) | publishers | 68% | 144MB | - |
| 2014-12-03 | 2.0.48 | 1.4k(1400) | publishers | 95% | 140MB | [code][p2] |
| 2014-12-03 | 2.0.47 | 1.4k(1400) | publishers | 95% | 140MB | - |
| 2014-12-03 | 2.0.47 | 1.2k(1200) | publishers | 84% | 76MB | [code][p1] |
| 2014-12-03 | 2.0.12 | 1.2k(1200) | publishers | 96% | 43MB | - |
| 2014-12-03 | 1.0.10 | 1.2k(1200) | publishers | 96% | 43MB | - |
| Update | SFU | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Threads | VM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-11 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 2300 | publishers | ~89% x1 | 1.1GB | 1 | G5 8CPU |
| 2021-05-11 | NginxRTMP/v1.2.1 | 1300 | publishers | ~84% x1 | 198MB | 1 | G5 8CPU |
Note: The test was conducted on CentOS7 with a video bitrate of 600Kbps and CPU of G5-2.5GHZ (SkyLake).
##Play HTTP FLV benchmark
Here is the data for HTTP-FLV playback, as tested using the srs-bench tool:
| Update | SRS | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-05-25 | 2.0.171 | 6.0k(6000) | players | 84% | 297MB | [code][p20] |
| 2014-05-24 | 2.0.170 | 3.0k(3000) | players | 89% | 96MB | [code][p19] |
| 2014-05-24 | 2.0.169 | 3.0k(3000) | players | 94% | 188MB | [code][p18] |
| 2014-05-24 | 2.0.168 | 2.3k(2300) | players | 92% | 276MB | [code][p17] |
| 2014-05-24 | 2.0.167 | 1.0k(1000) | players | 82% | 86MB | - |
RTC benchmark
The following data reflects WebRTC playback performance, as tested using the srs-bench tool:
| Update | SFU | Clients | Type | CPU | Memory | Threads | VM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-10 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 2000 | players | ~94% x1 | 462MB | 1 | G7 2CPU |
| 2021-05-10 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 1000 | players | ~90% x1 | 180MB | 1 | G5 2CPU |
| 2021-03-31 | SRS/v4.0.87 | 800 | players | ~94% x1 | 444MB | 1 | G5 2CPU |
| 2021-05-10 | Janus/v0.11.1 | 700 | players | ~93% x2 | 430MB | 24 | G5 2CPU |
| 2021-05-10 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 1700 | publishers | ~92% x1 | 334MB | 1 | G7 2CPU |
| 2021-05-10 | SRS/v4.0.105 | 950 | publishers | ~92% x1 | 132MB | 1 | G5 2CPU |
| 2021-03-31 | SRS/v4.0.87 | 550 | publishers | ~86% x1 | 1.3GB | 1 | G5 2CPU |
| 2021-05-10 | Janus/v0.11.1 | 350 | publishers | ~93% x2 | 405MB | 23 | G5 2CPU |
Note: The test was conducted on CentOS7 with a video bitrate of 600Kbps and CPU of G5-2.5GHZ (SkyLake).
Latency benchmark
The following benchmark data shows end-to-end latency tested using the srs-bench tool with SRS running in real-time configuration(CN, EN):
| Update | SRS | Protocol | VP6 | H.264 | VP6+MP3 | H.264+MP3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-12-16 | 2.0.72 | RTMP | 0.1s | 0.4s | [0.8s][p15] | [0.6s][p16] |
| 2014-12-12 | 2.0.70 | RTMP | [0.1s][p13] | [0.4s][p14] | 1.0s | 0.9s |
| 2014-12-03 | 1.0.10 | RTMP | 0.4s | 0.4s | 0.9s | 1.2s |
| 2021-04-02 | 4.0.87 | WebRTC | x | 80ms | x | x |
2018-08-05, c45f72e, Refine HTTP-FLV latency, support realtime mode. 2.0.252
Note: Multiple factors can impact end-to-end latency, such as the encoder, server, protocol, player, and network.
Note: VLC player is not recommended for low latency use scenarios due to its large buffer, resulting in significant latency.
Winlin 2021