ton/tolk-tester/tests/invalid-call-1.tolk

const asdf = 1;

fun main(x: int) {
    return x.asdf();
}

/**
@compilation_should_fail
@stderr non-existing method `asdf` of type `int`
 */
[Tolk] Rewrite the type system from Hindley-Milner to static typing FunC's (and Tolk's before this PR) type system is based on Hindley-Milner. This is a common approach for functional languages, where types are inferred from usage through unification. As a result, type declarations are not necessary: () f(a,b) { return a+b; } // a and b now int, since `+` (int, int) While this approach works for now, problems arise with the introduction of new types like bool, where `!x` must handle both int and bool. It will also become incompatible with int32 and other strict integers. This will clash with structure methods, struggle with proper generics, and become entirely impractical for union types. This PR completely rewrites the type system targeting the future. 1) type of any expression is inferred and never changed 2) this is available because dependent expressions already inferred 3) forall completely removed, generic functions introduced (they work like template functions actually, instantiated while inferring) 4) instantiation `<...>` syntax, example: `t.tupleAt<int>(0)` 5) `as` keyword, for example `t.tupleAt(0) as int` 6) methods binding is done along with type inferring, not before ("before", as worked previously, was always a wrong approach) 2024-12-30 15:31:27 +00:00			`const asdf = 1;`

			`fun main(x: int) {`
			`return x.asdf();`
[Tolk] Get rid of ~tilda with `mutate` and `self` methods This is a very big change. If FunC has `.methods()` and `~methods()`, Tolk has only dot, one and only way to call a `.method()`. A method may mutate an object, or may not. It's a behavioral and semantic difference from FunC. - `cs.loadInt(32)` modifies a slice and returns an integer - `b.storeInt(x, 32)` modifies a builder - `b = b.storeInt()` also works, since it not only modifies, but returns - chained methods also work, they return `self` - everything works exactly as expected, similar to JS - no runtime overhead, exactly same Fift instructions - custom methods are created with ease - tilda `~` does not exist in Tolk at all 2024-10-31 07:18:54 +00:00			`}`

			`/**`
			`@compilation_should_fail`
[Tolk] Support syntax `tensorVar.0` and `tupleVar.0` It works both for reading and writing: > var t = (1, 2); > t.0; // 1 > t.0 = 5; > t; // (5, 2) It also works for typed/untyped tuples, producing INDEX and SETINDEX. Global tensors and tuples works. Nesting `t.0.1.2` works. `mutate` works. Even mixing tuples inside tensors inside a global for writing works. 2025-01-27 07:29:17 +00:00			@stderr non-existing method `asdf` of type `int`
[Tolk] Get rid of ~tilda with `mutate` and `self` methods This is a very big change. If FunC has `.methods()` and `~methods()`, Tolk has only dot, one and only way to call a `.method()`. A method may mutate an object, or may not. It's a behavioral and semantic difference from FunC. - `cs.loadInt(32)` modifies a slice and returns an integer - `b.storeInt(x, 32)` modifies a builder - `b = b.storeInt()` also works, since it not only modifies, but returns - chained methods also work, they return `self` - everything works exactly as expected, similar to JS - no runtime overhead, exactly same Fift instructions - custom methods are created with ease - tilda `~` does not exist in Tolk at all 2024-10-31 07:18:54 +00:00			`*/`